{"id":2982,"date":"2008-09-23T12:30:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-23T17:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thpwebdev5.com\/index.php\/2008\/09\/tongues-or-unknown-languages-in-1-cor-12-14\/"},"modified":"2021-12-08T09:22:52","modified_gmt":"2021-12-08T09:22:52","slug":"tongues-or-unknown-languages-in-1-cor-12-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wpmu3.northcentralus.cloudapp.azure.com\/nlt\/2008\/09\/23\/tongues-or-unknown-languages-in-1-cor-12-14\/","title":{"rendered":"“Tongues” or “Unknown languages” in 1 Cor 12-14?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mark D. Taylor<\/p>\n

Brent Kercheville has been writing a series of blogs about his interaction with the NLT text. One of those posts is called “Tongues vs. Languages (1 Corinthians 12-14).”<\/a> Brent appreciates the NLT’s use of “languages” in place of the more obscure term “tongues” in 1 Cor 12, but he expresses frustration that the NLT then uses “tongues” in chapter 14.<\/p>\n

In fact, the NLT uses both “speaking in tongues” and “speaking in unknown languages” in 1 Cor 14. Why? We had vigorous debates on the translation committee as to how we should translate glossa<\/i> in a way that would be understandable to modern readers–especially those without much background in biblical teaching. And the situation is further complicated because scholars and church historians are divided as to whether Paul was referring in this passage to human languages not otherwise known to the speaker or to ecstatic utterances that are unrelated to any human language. If the translation had simply and consistently used “unknown languages,” it would imply that Paul was referring to human languages unknown to the speakers (as seems to have been the case on the Day of Pentecost; Acts 2:4-11). But if we had used the traditional term “tongues” throughout, it would imply that Paul was referring only to ecstatic utterances.<\/p>\n

So in the end we decided to use both terms. This allows the reader to get the sense that Paul might have been referring to either or both of these meanings. We were apprehensive about using the word “tongues,” because it is a technical term understood only by readers well versed in biblical teaching. On the other hand, it is the term used in Pentecostal churches to refer to the contemporary phenomenon of “speaking in tongues.” So we used both “tongues” and “unknown languages” in order to provide the broadest sense of the meaning of the passage.<\/p>\n

Incidentally, the NLT Study Bible<\/i> provides a word study on the various uses of glossa<\/i> in the New Testament.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"